Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on hemodynamics, cerebral oxygen metabolism and analgesia during maintenance of paediatric anaesthesia

Si Zhenqiang , Sun Fei, Liu Lu

Department of Anaesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China;

For correspondence:-  Si Zhenqiang   Email: ra1278@163.com

Accepted: 31 December 2018        Published: 31 January 2019

Citation: Zhenqiang S, Fei S, Lu L. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on hemodynamics, cerebral oxygen metabolism and analgesia during maintenance of paediatric anaesthesia. Trop J Pharm Res 2019; 18(1):187-192 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v18i1.28

© 2019 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on hemodynamics, cerebral oxygen metabolism and analgesia during maintenance of paediatric anaesthesia.
Methods: A total of 134 paediatric patients undergoing surgical anaesthesia in the General Surgery Department of Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2016 to July 2017 were anesthetised with propofol (control group, n = 67) or sevoflurane (study group, n = 67). The hemodynamics, cerebral oxygen metabolism index, analgesic effect and adverse reaction were determined in both groups and compared.
Results: Heart rate (HR) differed significantly between the two groups in the A3 stage (p < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were statistically different between the two groups in the A2 stage (p < 0.05). In the A2 and A3 stages, jugular venous blood oxygen saturation (SjvO2) was higher in the study group, and the differential between arterial oxygen and jugular venous blood oxygen saturation (Da-jvO2) and cerebral oxygen extraction rate (CERO2) were lower than corresponding values in the control group (p < 0.05). In both groups of patients, SjvO2 in A3 stage was lower than that in A2 stage (p < 0.05), and Da-jvO2 and CERO2 were higher in A3 stage than those in A2 stage (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Sevoflurane and propofol maintain balance in cerebral oxygen metabolism and hemodynamic stability when used as paediatric anaesthesia. However, sevoflurane is superior to propofol in protecting the brain tissue of children from damage.

Keywords: Propofol, Sevoflurane, Hemodynamics, Cerebral oxygen metabolism, Analgesic

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates